To: Voyager Imaging Team Date: 16 jan. 1986 From: T. V. Johnson, Arithmatic Society Subject: Corrections to Danielson et al. Calibration The current calibration factors used to correct FICOR output to I/F are derived from the Danielson et al. paper. These factors, and their associated omega0 values qualitatively amount to the assumption that the VGR camera bench calibrations for the Blue filter are correct and that the color of the inflight plaque target is the same as that measured by Rennelson for a piece of similar material. This correction brought most VGR I/F values for Jupiter targets into resonably good agreement with ground- based data both in absolute albedo at Blue (~4800 A) and in relative spectral reflectance between filters. Subsequent analysis of VGR spectral data and comparisons with ground-based spectral reflectance measurements have shown that the Danielson et al. corrections to bench calibration values do not completely correct VGR values to the best estimates of ground-based spectral albedoes for a number of targets, both at Jupiter and Saturn (see Johnson et al. 1982 for a discussion of Jupiter satellite comparisons). The attached figure shows several estimates of 'corrected' VGR I/F values divided by ground-based 'truth'. The square points are an average and standard deviation of VGR data divided by ground-based data from McFadden et al. (appropriately convolved with the NA camera system response), for all four Galilean satellites and for both the Voyager 1 and 2 cameras. The circled X's are a similar exercise carried out by Bonnie Burratti for several Saturnian satellites compared with values from ground-based photometry by Noland et al. The other points are individual comparisons I made of Rhea photometry with data from Bell et al. The ratios are all very consistent and the current estimate of the correction to the Danielson et al. values has been made from the average of the Johnson values for Jupiter and the Burratti estimates for Saturn. Scaled to Blue filter correction = 1.0000 these values are: UV - 0.828 VI - 0.935 BL - 1.000 OR - 1.053 The values of IPL correction factors and the Omega0 values for each planet in the attached table are derived from the above by multiplying the existing omega0's by the above values and dividing the IPL factors by the same. We recommend that the the MIPL FIXVGR program replace the existing values for these correction factors with the ones in the table and use them for future I/F processing. Date: 16-Jan-86 VOYAGER 2 CALIBRATION FACTORS: NARROW ANGLE CAMERA ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Filter Clear Violet Blue Orange Green Ultraviolet # 0,4 1 2 3 5,6 7 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ J IPL Corr.factor 0.913 0.884 1.000 0.961 1.013 3.151 S IPL Corr.factor 3.054 2.957 3.345 3.215 3.388 10.540 U IPL Corr.factor 12.346 11.954 13.523 12.999 13.698 42.611 J omega 0(5.2au) 2161.980 669.114 909.510 205.368 475.310 69.292 S omega 0(9.51au) 646.394 200.053 271.928 61.401 142.109 20.717 U omega 0(19.122au 159.879 49.481 67.259 15.187 35.149 5.124 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ VOYAGER 2 CALIBRATION FACTORS: WIDE ANGLE ANGLE CAMERA ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Filter Blue Clear Violet Green Orange # 1 2 3 5 7 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ J IPL Corr.factor 1.068 1.022 0.897 1.003 0.989 S IPL Corr.factor 3.572 3.418 3.000 3.355 3.308 U IPL Corr.factor 14.442 13.820 12.130 13.563 13.374 J omega 0(5.2au) 6099.45 11447.76 2569.06 3369.9 963.684 S omega 0(9.51au) 1823.628 3422.679 768.104 1007.541 288.125 U omega 0(19.122au) 451.056 846.566 189.983 249.205 71.265 ------------------------------------------------------------------------